PART II: Options When Advance Planning is not Possible
(This concludes our two-part series with relevant information for real estate investors involved in partnerships. See part one that discusses options for investors when advance planning is possible.)
If distributing an undivided interest of the partnership property or dissolving the partnership well in advance of the exchange is not possible, the partners who want to exchange have the following options at their disposal as well:
Purchase the interest of a retiring partner: This technique can be implemented before or after a §1031 exchange. If done before the exchange, the partners who want to exchange contribute additional equity which is used to buy out the retiring partner(s). The smaller partnership then enters into an exchange. The partnership must acquire Replacement Property which has the same or greater value compared to the Relinquished Property to fully defer taxes. If the partner buy out occurs after the exchange, the partnership typically refinances the Replacement Property received in the exchange to generate the cash necessary to buy out the retiring partner(s).
Sell the Relinquished Property for cash and an installment note: Under this method, the buyer of the Relinquished Property purchases the property with both cash and an installment note. The cash is used by the partnership in the exchange and the retiring partner receives the installment note in redemption of their partnership interest. If at least one payment is made in the following tax year, it should be considered a valid installment note and receive installment sale treatment under I.R.C. §453. Most tax advisors suggest that at least 5% of the total payments of the note be made in the next tax year.
Here are two additional options where partners are willing to cooperate:
Divide the partnership: This option can be utilized before, after and possibly during an exchange. Using the partnership division rules of I.R.C. §708(b)(2), a partnership can divide into two or more partnerships. If a new partnership contains partners, who together, owned more than 50% of the original partnership, it is deemed to be a continuation of the original partnership. Although there may be more than one “continuing partnership”, only the continuing partnership which has the greatest fair market value (net of liabilities) will continue to use the Employer Identification Number (EIN) of the original partnership. All other partnerships resulting from the division will obtain a new EIN.
For example, let’s assume that a partnership is comprised of John and Jeff (each owns a 50% interest) = who want to dissolve the partnership; John wants to do a §1031 exchange but Jeff wants to sell his interest and “cash out. ” John-Jeff Partnership would divide into two partnerships; John-Jeff Partnership I (John owns a 99% interest and Jeff owns a 1% interest) and John-Jeff Partnership II (John owns a 1% interest and Jeff owns a 99% interest). John-Jeff Partnership would transfer the partnership property 51% to John-Jeff Partnership I and 49% to John-Jeff Partnership II, as tenants in common. Upon sale of the Relinquished Property, 51% of the sale proceeds would go to a Qualified Intermediary for John-Jeff Partnership I’s §1031 exchange and 49% of the proceeds would be distributed to the John-Jeff Partnership II for further distribution to the individual partners. As a result, John has a 99% interest in the partnership which owns the Replacement Property (which continues to use the original partnership’s EIN) while Jeff receives 99% of the cash value of his interest in the original partnership. After one to two years, John could buy Jeff’s interest in John-Jeff Partnership I and complete the separation, based on a consultation with his tax advisor. Although partnership division may not be suitable for all partnership scenarios, it provides a way to achieve separation over a period of time and still comply with the “held for” requirement of §1031.
Purchase multiple properties by partnership: Although some authority exists to apply partnership division to situations where both partners want to exchange (but into separate properties), some advisors are not comfortable with this because only one of the resulting partnerships is permitted to continue using the original partnership’s EIN. They prefer that the partnership purchase multiple replacement properties. Applying this to our example, John-Jeff Partnership would exchange into two Replacement Properties and amend the partnership agreement to disproportionately allocate the respective income and depreciation from the properties to John and Jeff. Most advisors believe that at least 10% must be allocated to the minority partner. Accordingly, the John-Jeff Partnership would buy Property 1 and Property 2. John would be allocated 90% of the income and depreciation of Property 1 and Jeff would be allocated 10%. The reverse would be applied to the allocation of income and depreciation relating to Property 2. After a period of time determined by their tax advisor (and with no prearranged plan) John and Jeff could dissolve the partnership distributing Property 1 to John and Property 2 to Jeff.
Based upon the complexity of these scenarios, it’s imperative that you consult with your tax adviser before considering any of these options.